| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs i5-13400


Description
Both models i9-13900K and i5-13400 are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.5 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
10/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
47.01k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
26.73k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
14.28k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
12.1k (x0.62)
TOTAL
129.15k
100.11k (x0.78)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
228.2k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
160.28k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
71.12k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
38.23k (x1.11)
TOTAL
1763.08k
497.83k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4