| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs i5-11400F


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.6 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
495.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
31.66k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
26.21k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
11.96k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
18.5k (x0.95)
TOTAL
129.15k
88.34k (x0.68)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
210.36k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
203.84k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
72.05k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
9.4k (x0.27)
TOTAL
1763.08k
495.65k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
7625 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4