| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i9-9900KF


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2 times faster than the i9-9900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
906ed
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
592.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
33.03k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
29.52k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
6.55k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
15.45k (x1)
TOTAL
112.85k
84.54k (x0.75)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
276.22k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
250.61k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
57.2k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
8.84k (x0.5)
TOTAL
1160.72k
592.86k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
6241 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4