| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i7-10870H


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0652
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
30.38k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
27.95k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
6.51k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
14.37k (x0.93)
TOTAL
112.85k
79.2k (x0.7)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
216.18k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
210.82k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
51.57k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
8.47k (x0.48)
TOTAL
1160.72k
487.05k (x0.42)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4