| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i5-5675R


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
40671
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
24/32
4/4
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
194.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
21.91k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
18.59k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
5.2k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
5.72k (x0.37)
TOTAL
112.85k
51.43k (x0.46)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
84.92k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
72.09k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
20.13k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
17.07k (x0.97)
TOTAL
1160.72k
194.2k (x0.17)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4