| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
32.74k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
27.35k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
14.23k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
27.41k (x1.77)
TOTAL
112.85k
101.73k (x0.9)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
236.69k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
202.63k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
102.8k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
11.28k (x0.64)
TOTAL
1160.72k
553.41k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4