| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.1 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Dragon Range
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
55 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
65536 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
37.43k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
30.7k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
15.16k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
29.78k (x1.92)
TOTAL
112.85k
113.07k (x1)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
556.68k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
482.32k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
225.46k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
49.48k (x2.8)
TOTAL
1160.72k
1313.94k (x1.13)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4