Core i9-13900HX vs i9-13900KS
Description
Both models i9-13900HX and i9-13900KS are based on Raptor Lake architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1.5 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1.5 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
24/32
TDP
55 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
1708.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
57.69k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
33.34k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
17.55k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
18.76k (x1.21)
TOTAL
112.85k
127.35k (x1.13)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
757.76k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
626.83k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
294.93k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
29.05k (x1.64)
TOTAL
1160.72k
1708.56k (x1.47)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
11390 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4