| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i5-13600K


Description
Both models i9-13900HX and i5-13600K are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i5-13600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
14/20
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
115.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
1023.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
54.36k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
29.93k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
15.39k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
15.52k (x1)
TOTAL
112.85k
115.19k (x1.02)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
457.21k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
360.82k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
172.64k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
32.91k (x1.86)
TOTAL
1160.72k
1023.59k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
3658 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
2887 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
1381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
8189 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
10658 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
3018 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3042 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
22587 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4