Core i9-13900HX vs i5-13400
Description
Both models i9-13900HX and i5-13400 are based on Raptor Lake architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
10/16
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
497.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
47.01k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
26.73k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
14.28k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
12.1k (x0.78)
TOTAL
112.85k
100.11k (x0.89)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
228.2k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
160.28k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
71.12k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
38.23k (x2.16)
TOTAL
1160.72k
497.83k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
7659 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4