Core i9-13900HX vs i5-12400F
Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
90675
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
33.85k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
20.33k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
10.51k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
11.77k (x0.76)
TOTAL
112.85k
76.46k (x0.68)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
174.21k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
141.31k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
64.86k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
19.01k (x1.08)
TOTAL
1160.72k
399.39k (x0.34)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4