Core i9-13900HX vs i5-12400
Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Arder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
544.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
48.08k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
25.6k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
14.02k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
14.81k (x0.96)
TOTAL
112.85k
102.51k (x0.91)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
230.14k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
198.07k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
94.78k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
21.64k (x1.22)
TOTAL
1160.72k
544.64k (x0.47)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
8379 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4