| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 4.8 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
806c2
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
24/32
4/8
TDP
55 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
239.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
30.89k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
25.57k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
10.64k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
15.66k (x1.01)
TOTAL
112.85k
82.77k (x0.73)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
96.34k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
95.75k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
32.29k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
15.2k (x0.86)
TOTAL
1160.72k
239.58k (x0.21)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4