| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E5-2690 v3


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
306f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/24
12/24
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
1016.36k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
20.96k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
11.74k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
4.61k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
3.4k (x0.2)
TOTAL
107.15k
40.71k (x0.38)

Multithread

i7-13700T

E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
531.68k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
342.28k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
133.22k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
9.19k (x0.56)
TOTAL
951.3k
1016.36k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
7529 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4