| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1687.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.8 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raphael
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
16/24
16/32
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
131072 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
122.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
1687.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
41.61k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
31.34k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
16.95k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
33.08k (x1.94)
TOTAL
107.15k
122.98k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-13700T

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
647k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
533.47k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
279.07k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
228.31k (x13.95)
TOTAL
951.3k
1687.86k (x1.77)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
5392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
4446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
2326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
1903 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
14065 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
7300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5499 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
2973 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
5803 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
21575 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4