| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.4 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Dragon Range
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
16/24
16/32
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
65536 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
37.43k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
30.7k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
15.16k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
29.78k (x1.74)
TOTAL
107.15k
113.07k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-13700T

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
556.68k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
482.32k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
225.46k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
49.48k (x3.02)
TOTAL
951.3k
1313.94k (x1.38)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4