| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs Ryzen 7 7840HS


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.5 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
622.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
31.57k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
25.2k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
12.42k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
21.93k (x1.28)
TOTAL
107.15k
91.11k (x0.85)

Multithread

i7-13700T

7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
265.26k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
226.13k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
114.46k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
16.49k (x1.01)
TOTAL
951.3k
622.34k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
17781 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4