| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs i9-13900HX


Description
Both models i7-13700T and i9-13900HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.2 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
16/24
24/32
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
53.69k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
28.76k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
14.93k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
15.47k (x0.91)
TOTAL
107.15k
112.85k (x1.05)

Multithread

i7-13700T

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
526.44k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
420.48k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
196.13k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
17.68k (x1.08)
TOTAL
951.3k
1160.72k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4