| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs i3-13100F


Description
Both models i7-13700T and i3-13100F are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 2.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06f5
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/24
4/8
TDP
35 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
47.14k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
25.77k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
13.25k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
14.77k (x0.87)
TOTAL
107.15k
100.94k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-13700T

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
168.51k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
142.8k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
63.57k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
15.34k (x0.94)
TOTAL
951.3k
390.23k (x0.41)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4