| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs i9-12900KF


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.3 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/24
16/24
TDP
35 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
1219.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
57.05k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
29.66k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
16.48k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
17.78k (x1.04)
TOTAL
107.15k
120.97k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-13700T

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
546.04k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
437.01k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
211.36k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
24.92k (x1.52)
TOTAL
951.3k
1219.33k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4