| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs i9-11900H


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.6 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
806d1
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
33.38k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
27.12k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
11.69k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
17k (x1)
TOTAL
107.15k
89.19k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-13700T

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
249.83k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
237.26k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
84.18k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
13.2k (x0.81)
TOTAL
951.3k
584.47k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4