| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700K vs i9-13900HX


Description
Both models i7-13700K and i9-13900HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700K gets a score of 1234.7 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700K is 1.1 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
16/24
24/32
TDP
125 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+2x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
36864 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
121.79k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
1234.67k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
53.98k
53.69k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
31.5k
28.76k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.52k
14.93k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.78k
15.47k (x0.78)
TOTAL
121.79k
112.85k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-13700K

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
574.06k
526.44k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
435.61k
420.48k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.31k
196.13k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
17.68k (x1.29)
TOTAL
1234.67k
1160.72k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i7-13700K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4592 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3485 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1690 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
9877 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9997 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5834 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3059 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3664 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
22553 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4