| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E5-4640


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 836.9 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.4 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
206d7
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
16/24
8 /16
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
610.16k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
27.23k
5.01k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
27.1k
4.5k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
2.18k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
2.19k (x0.14)
TOTAL
85.5k
13.88k (x0.16)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
277.49k
251.29k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
360.68k
236.61k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.57k
114.89k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.19k
7.36k (x0.29)
TOTAL
836.93k
610.16k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
5045 points/W
2645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6558 points/W
2491 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3156 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
15217 points/W
6423 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
5446 points/GHz
1790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5420 points/GHz
1609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3130 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3104 points/GHz
782 points/GHz
TOTAL
17101 points/GHz
4957 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4