| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 836.9 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
306e4
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
16/24
10 /20
TDP
55 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
551.1k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
27.23k
10.55k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
27.1k
10.02k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
3.99k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
3.66k (x0.24)
TOTAL
85.5k
28.23k (x0.33)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
277.49k
215.04k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
360.68k
230.43k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.57k
96.87k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.19k
8.76k (x0.35)
TOTAL
836.93k
551.1k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5045 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6558 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3156 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
15217 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5446 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5420 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3130 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3104 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
17101 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4