| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 3.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
306f2
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
55 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
27.23k
13.1k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
27.1k
11.91k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
4.83k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
3.83k (x0.25)
TOTAL
85.5k
33.68k (x0.39)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
277.49k
105.42k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
360.68k
109.99k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.57k
44.56k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.19k
17.7k (x0.7)
TOTAL
836.93k
277.66k (x0.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
20.99k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
11.9k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
4.72k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
3.75k (x0.23)
TOTAL
109.41k
41.36k (x0.38)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
172.62k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
110.03k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
44.06k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
16.93k (x0.67)
TOTAL
1070.39k
343.64k (x0.32)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4