| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the i7-13700HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
50657
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
16/24
18/36
TDP
55 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
1241.12k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
27.23k
16.4k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
27.1k
20.97k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
5.82k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
8.86k (x0.57)
TOTAL
85.5k
52.05k (x0.61)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
277.49k
316.84k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
360.68k
461.09k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.57k
129.82k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.19k
22.09k (x0.88)
TOTAL
836.93k
929.85k (x1.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
29.53k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
22.59k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
5.99k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
10.22k (x0.62)
TOTAL
109.41k
68.33k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
587.06k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
496.41k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
134.66k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
22.99k (x0.92)
TOTAL
1070.39k
1241.12k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4