| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.3 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a0655
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/24
10/20
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
35.87k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
31.43k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
7.34k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
15.73k (x0.96)
TOTAL
109.41k
90.37k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
377.56k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
347.59k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
88.08k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
12.24k (x0.49)
TOTAL
1070.39k
825.47k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4