| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen 9 7940HS


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.5 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
718.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
38.25k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
29.92k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
15.5k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
29.89k (x1.82)
TOTAL
109.41k
113.57k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
309.6k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
260.4k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
128.56k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
20.04k (x0.8)
TOTAL
1070.39k
718.59k (x0.67)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
20531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4