| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen 9 5900X


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.3 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a20f12
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Vermeer
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
12/24
TDP
55 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
814.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
22.6k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
24.85k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
11.25k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
24.8k (x1.51)
TOTAL
109.41k
83.5k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
258.21k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
342.24k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
155.3k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
59k (x2.35)
TOTAL
1070.39k
814.74k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
7759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4