Core i7-13700HX vs i9-13900K

Description

Both models i7-13700HX and i9-13900K are based on Raptor Lake architecture.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 1.6 times faster than the i7-13700HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

CPUID

b06f2

b0671

Core

Raptor Lake-HX

Raptor Lake-S

Architecture

Raptor Lake

Base frecuency

2.1 GHz

2.2 GHz

Boost frecuency

5 GHz

5.8 GHz

Socket

BGA 1964

LGA 1700

Cores/Threads

16/24

24/32

TDP

55 W

125 W

Cache L1 (d+i)

8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB

8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB

Cache L2

8x2048/2x4096 kB

8x2048+4x4096 kB

Cache L3

30720 kB

36864 kB

Date

January 2023

October 2022

Mean monothread perf.

109.41k points

129.15k points

Mean multithread perf.

1070.39k points

1763.08k points

AVX optimized benchmark

The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.

Monothread

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

Test#1 (Integers)

27.23k

31.8k (x1.17)

Test#2 (FP)

27.1k

32.83k (x1.21)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

15.65k

18.37k (x1.17)

Test#1 (Memory)

15.52k

21.13k (x1.36)

TOTAL

85.5k

104.13k (x1.22)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

Test#1 (Integers)

277.49k

532.97k (x1.92)

Test#2 (FP)

360.68k

596.78k (x1.65)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

173.57k

342.96k (x1.98)

Test#1 (Memory)

25.19k

28.6k (x1.14)

TOTAL

836.93k

1501.31k (x1.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark

The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.

Monothread

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

Test#1 (Integers)

48.57k

58.6k (x1.21)

Test#2 (FP)

28.78k

33.29k (x1.16)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

15.6k

17.77k (x1.14)

Test#1 (Memory)

16.46k

19.49k (x1.18)

TOTAL

109.41k

129.15k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

Test#1 (Integers)

486.01k

804.04k (x1.65)

Test#2 (FP)

386.1k

613.45k (x1.59)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

173.21k

311.08k (x1.8)

Test#1 (Memory)

25.08k

34.5k (x1.38)

TOTAL

1070.39k

1763.08k (x1.65)

Performance/W

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

Test#1 (Integers)

8836 points/W

6432 points/W

Test#2 (FP)

7020 points/W

4908 points/W

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

3149 points/W

2489 points/W

Test#1 (Memory)

456 points/W

276 points/W

TOTAL

19462 points/W

14105 points/W

Performance/GHz

i7-13700HX

i9-13900K

Test#1 (Integers)

9715 points/GHz

10104 points/GHz

Test#2 (FP)

5755 points/GHz

5739 points/GHz

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

3120 points/GHz

3064 points/GHz

Test#1 (Memory)

3293 points/GHz

3360 points/GHz

TOTAL

21882 points/GHz

22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph

Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Multithread performance graph

Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4