| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs i9-13900HX


Description
Both models i7-13700HX and i9-13900HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i7-13700HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
16/24
24/32
TDP
55 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
53.69k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
28.76k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
14.93k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
15.47k (x0.94)
TOTAL
109.41k
112.85k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
526.44k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
420.48k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
196.13k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
17.68k (x0.7)
TOTAL
1070.39k
1160.72k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4