| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs i5-13400


Description
Both models i7-13700HX and i5-13400 are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2.2 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/24
10/16
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
47.01k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
26.73k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
14.28k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
12.1k (x0.73)
TOTAL
109.41k
100.11k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
228.2k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
160.28k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
71.12k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
38.23k (x1.52)
TOTAL
1070.39k
497.83k (x0.47)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4