| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2.7 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
90675
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
55 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
399.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.23k
24.24k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
27.1k
24.74k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
13.95k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
14.47k (x0.93)
TOTAL
85.5k
77.41k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
277.49k
126.87k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
360.68k
186.48k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.57k
92.37k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.19k
15.45k (x0.61)
TOTAL
836.93k
421.18k (x0.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
33.85k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
20.33k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
10.51k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
11.77k (x0.72)
TOTAL
109.41k
76.46k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
174.21k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
141.31k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
64.86k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
19.01k (x0.76)
TOTAL
1070.39k
399.39k (x0.37)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4