| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700HX vs i5-12400


Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
544.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
27.23k
23.84k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
27.1k
25.09k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
14.1k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
14.48k (x0.93)
TOTAL
85.5k
77.51k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
277.49k
123.98k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
360.68k
176.89k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.57k
97.42k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.19k
20.78k (x0.82)
TOTAL
836.93k
419.07k (x0.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
48.08k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
25.6k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
14.02k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
14.81k (x0.9)
TOTAL
109.41k
102.51k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-13700HX

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
230.14k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
198.07k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
94.78k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
21.64k (x0.86)
TOTAL
1070.39k
544.64k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i7-13700HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
8379 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4