| | | | | | |

Core i5-13600K vs Xeon E5-2690 v3


Description
The i5-13600K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13600K gets a score of 1023.6 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
306f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
14/20
12/24
TDP
125 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
115.19k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.59k points
1016.36k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13600K
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
54.36k
20.96k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
11.74k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
4.61k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
3.4k (x0.22)
TOTAL
115.19k
40.71k (x0.35)

Multithread

i5-13600K

E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
457.21k
531.68k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
360.82k
342.28k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
172.64k
133.22k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.91k
9.19k (x0.28)
TOTAL
1023.59k
1016.36k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i5-13600K
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3658 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
8189 points/W
7529 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13600K
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10658 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5869 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3018 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3042 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
22587 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4