| | | | | | |

Core i5-13600K vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i5-13600K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13600K gets a score of 1023.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 1.2 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0655
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
10/20
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
115.19k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.59k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13600K
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
54.36k
35.87k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
31.43k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
7.34k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
15.73k (x1.01)
TOTAL
115.19k
90.37k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-13600K

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
457.21k
377.56k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
360.82k
347.59k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
172.64k
88.08k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.91k
12.24k (x0.37)
TOTAL
1023.59k
825.47k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i5-13600K
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3658 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
8189 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13600K
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10658 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5869 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3018 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3042 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
22587 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4