| | | | | | |

Core i5-13600K vs Ryzen 9 7940HS


Description
The i5-13600K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13600K gets a score of 1023.6 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 1.4 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
115.19k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.59k points
718.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13600K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
54.36k
38.25k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
29.92k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
15.5k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
29.89k (x1.93)
TOTAL
115.19k
113.57k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-13600K

7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
457.21k
309.6k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
360.82k
260.4k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
172.64k
128.56k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.91k
20.04k (x0.61)
TOTAL
1023.59k
718.59k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-13600K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3658 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
8189 points/W
20531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13600K
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
10658 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5869 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3018 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3042 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
22587 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4