| | | | | | |

Core i5-13600K vs i9-13900KS


Description
Both models i5-13600K and i9-13900KS are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13600K gets a score of 1023.6 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1.7 times faster than the i5-13600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
24/32
TDP
125 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
115.19k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.59k points
1708.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13600K
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
54.36k
57.69k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
33.34k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
17.55k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
18.76k (x1.21)
TOTAL
115.19k
127.35k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-13600K

i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
457.21k
757.76k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
360.82k
626.83k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
172.64k
294.93k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.91k
29.05k (x0.88)
TOTAL
1023.59k
1708.56k (x1.67)

Performance/W
i5-13600K
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
3658 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
8189 points/W
11390 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13600K
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
10658 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5869 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3018 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3042 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
22587 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4