| | | | | | |

Core i5-13600K vs i5-13400


Description
Both models i5-13600K and i5-13400 are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13600K gets a score of 1023.6 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 2.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
10/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
115.19k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.59k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13600K
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
54.36k
47.01k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
26.73k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
14.28k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
12.1k (x0.78)
TOTAL
115.19k
100.11k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-13600K

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
457.21k
228.2k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
360.82k
160.28k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
172.64k
71.12k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.91k
38.23k (x1.16)
TOTAL
1023.59k
497.83k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i5-13600K
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3658 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
8189 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13600K
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
10658 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5869 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3018 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3042 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
22587 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4