| | | | | | |

Core i5-13600K vs i9-12900KF


Description
The i5-13600K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13600K gets a score of 1023.6 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.2 times faster than the i5-13600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
16/24
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2022
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
115.19k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.59k points
1219.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13600K
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
54.36k
57.05k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
29.66k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
16.48k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
17.78k (x1.15)
TOTAL
115.19k
120.97k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-13600K

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
457.21k
546.04k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
360.82k
437.01k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
172.64k
211.36k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.91k
24.92k (x0.76)
TOTAL
1023.59k
1219.33k (x1.19)

Performance/W
i5-13600K
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3658 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
8189 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13600K
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10658 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5869 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3018 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3042 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
22587 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4