| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs Xeon E5-2680 v3


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
306f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
10/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
426.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
18.86k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
10.06k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
4.14k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
3.24k (x0.27)
TOTAL
100.11k
36.31k (x0.36)

Multithread

i5-13400

E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
218.93k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
139.75k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
55.47k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
12.42k (x0.32)
TOTAL
497.83k
426.58k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i5-13400
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
3555 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4