| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i7-10750H


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a0652
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
10/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
349.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
29.06k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
26.49k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
6.23k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
13.89k (x1.15)
TOTAL
100.11k
75.67k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-13400

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
154.61k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
151.34k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
36.33k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
6.93k (x0.18)
TOTAL
497.83k
349.21k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4