| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a0655
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
10/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
390.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
28.39k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
24.89k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
5.78k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
13.19k (x1.09)
TOTAL
100.11k
72.25k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-13400

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
180.2k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
163.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
40.6k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
6.48k (x0.17)
TOTAL
497.83k
390.78k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
6012 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4