| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA
Cores/Threads
10/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
32.74k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
27.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
14.23k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
27.41k (x2.27)
TOTAL
100.11k
101.73k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-13400

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
236.69k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
202.63k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
102.8k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
11.28k (x0.3)
TOTAL
497.83k
553.41k (x1.11)

Performance/W
i5-13400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4