| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1687.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raphael
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
10/16
16/32
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
131072 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
122.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
1687.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
41.61k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
31.34k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
16.95k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
33.08k (x2.73)
TOTAL
100.11k
122.98k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-13400

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
647k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
533.47k (x3.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
279.07k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
228.31k (x5.97)
TOTAL
497.83k
1687.86k (x3.39)

Performance/W
i5-13400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
5392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
4446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
2326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
1903 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
14065 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
7300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5499 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2973 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5803 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
21575 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4