| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 2.6 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Dragon Range
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
10/16
16/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
65536 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
37.43k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
30.7k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
15.16k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
29.78k (x2.46)
TOTAL
100.11k
113.07k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-13400

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
556.68k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
482.32k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
225.46k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
49.48k (x1.29)
TOTAL
497.83k
1313.94k (x2.64)

Performance/W
i5-13400
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4