Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 2.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 2.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a20f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/16
16/32
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
1060.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
19.88k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
25.26k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
10.77k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
23.59k (x1.95)
TOTAL
100.11k
79.51k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-13400
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
349.53k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
470.67k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
207.28k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
33.13k (x0.87)
TOTAL
497.83k
1060.62k (x2.13)
Performance/W
i5-13400
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
10101 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4