Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a20f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
24.34k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
26.8k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
12.12k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
26.55k (x2.19)
TOTAL
100.11k
89.82k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-13400
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
263.12k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
353.9k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
159.07k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
64.01k (x1.67)
TOTAL
497.83k
840.11k (x1.69)
Performance/W
i5-13400
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4