Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
17.1k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
26.59k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
8.91k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
23.21k (x1.92)
TOTAL
100.11k
75.81k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-13400
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
172.04k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
214.03k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
97.1k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
14.57k (x0.38)
TOTAL
497.83k
497.74k (x1)
Performance/W
i5-13400
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4