Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 5 5600
Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.2 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.2 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
a20f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
429.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
22.73k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
24.59k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
11.44k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
25.03k (x2.07)
TOTAL
100.11k
83.79k (x0.84)
Multithread
i5-13400
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
134.28k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
178.56k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
78.16k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
38.26k (x1)
TOTAL
497.83k
429.25k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i5-13400
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4